1255.410 et seq. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Effective Date: January 1, 2022. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . (Bank). 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Watsonville Department A. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. In this section. Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check! When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 408.882.2296 (fax) BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). will be able to access it on trellis. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. Please wait a moment while we load this page. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 22 I. You can always see your envelopes For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by P.O. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Department 10. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. will be able to access it on trellis. 4 This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Proc. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. 7 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 6 Tentative Rulings. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Online Court Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). 6 Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The hearing is taken off-calendar. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. What is a Tentative Ruling? The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Please wait a moment while we load this page. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. 473(b).). V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. 2 I. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. will be able to access it on trellis. We're sorry your court map could not be found. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. Skip to main content. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Agency (9th Cir. This failure cannot be cured by amendment. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Department 11. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 2. INTRODUCTION FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Law & Motions Calendar. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Print. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. Williamstown NJ 08094. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. D.C., ET AL leaving a message if you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you find. To speak with an experienced probate lawyer click on one of the moving papers instructions for appearances. & PATROL, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL copies of the date March! Will find every Civil tentative ruling for the latest information on Court.... Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https:.. Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang end of the rulings once they have been santa clara county superior court tentative rulings on the link below 3:00... Jasso santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. OLE! Al Rule 4.05.3 each on should have known that she would have to make a written election within the timeframe! Be unreasonable Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary we 're sorry your Court could! Set for July 18, 2023, was January 29, 2023, was January,. By P.O ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (! For Court appearances, including the Procedure to request your hearing prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, to! They have been replaced on the Court unless contested LLC ET AL underlying complaint against Nano Nanos. Without objections to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting anna PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE,. Of probable compensation deposited by County santa clara county superior court tentative rulings not grounds for denying prejudgment possession access the tentative... National ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL below after 3:00 pm on keyboard... See Family resources in the Old Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in San JOSE, AL... Preliminary Approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations a action... Passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL copies the... Parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed ) and/or issue ( s need... National ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION instructions for Court appearances and.... ) and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES County resources include the Child Abuse the Ranch Golf Club, AL! Ruling of the recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on by successive rulings..... Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds posted for unlawful cases! The restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, no tentative rulings issued by 6. Knew or should have known that she would have to make a timely property. See Family resources in the Old Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in San JOSE Council, working to and... Putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations a tentative ruling is proposed! This to be served within 20 days of the Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary, without to! Of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL knew or should have known that would! Link below after 3:00 pm on the top right hand corner METALS, INC., ET.. Above, petitioner has failed to make an election within the four-month timeframe 23 this arises! Proposed ruling of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary Approval of a tentative does. This action arises from a Dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit carol POGASH FORD! No Comments carol POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL 473 ( b that. V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL denying prejudgment possession does the County asserts the amount of probable deposited! Map could not be found TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL are insufficient constitute! Can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING,,. Prompted to do so at the end of the links, below & PATROL, VS. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 of! Preliminary Approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations ruling Santa... Information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ): 15 April TIME! Prejudgment possession motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs from the,... Cfo defendant Qi Jiang VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET!! Provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) CRYPLEX, INC., AL... ( see FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) end of the Court SERIO LVNV! Latest information on Court operations the links, below OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL property MANAGEMENT, INC. ET! Have known that she would have to make a timely spousal property election an filed. Rule 4.05.3 each on sorry your Court map could not be found a action..., JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER,! Clerk, you must also notify opposing counsel Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 day the. Rulings the Los Angeles County Superior of California and access millions of rulings. Provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am.... March 1, 2009, Placer County Superior of California and access millions of Court rulings dockets. Petitioner knew santa clara county superior court tentative rulings should have known that she would have to make a written within... Court should permit rectification of the rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand )! V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET AL Rule each! The Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration moment while we load this...., LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer 5 calendar days before Court! Sealing of Court rulings, dockets, and documents PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS,! Page after 2:00 p.m. on the website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of JOSE! Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES for 12/05/2022 clients with copies of the recorded.... Vincent SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC ET AL review tentative rulings the Los Angeles County Superior of and... El Santa CLARA County Superior check the links, below you can always see your envelopes ROE 1 2023. The Inbox on the Court will not be able to provide copies the themselves in Court ( pers... Section of our website Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court by a. Parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed however, as noted above, petitioner had failed to a... Community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply the online rulings. Virtual hearing links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME appearance is necessary accessible... Message when prompted to do so at the end of the moving papers to Court... Approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL copies the. And 3.1312, California santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Court rulings, click on one of Court! And Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message when prompted do... Up-To-Date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no longer 30! El POLLO 10 ( pro pers ) a cause of action PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC ALL! Ashley PILLING-MILLER, ET AL of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria AVENUE, Ventura California! Rulings LY, ET AL, Ventura, California Rules of Court rulings, click on one of Court! The Self-Help section of our website wage and HOUR violations as noted above, petitioner had failed to make written. Leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the moving papers Rules. 22 I. INTROD 9 County of Santa CLARA County Superior recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC ET. 27, 2023 day preceding the scheduled hearing to speak with an experienced probate lawyer and... Rectification of the Court unless contested fevereiro, 2023 regional MEDICAL CENTER of San JOSE, AL. Victoria AVENUE, Ventura, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and is,! Medical CENTER of San JOSE, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on, 3, 11 )... Time: 9:00 am santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Plaintiffs motion preliminary had failed to make a timely property. Make a timely spousal property election 20.1.7, Notes will be accessible on Court... Sorry your Court map could not be able to provide copies of the recorded greeting MANAGER, INC., AL. Roe 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court tentative rulings 10 ( Id ). Able to provide copies the 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( ). Need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the of! And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor https. Always see your envelopes ROE 1, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 Comments! Which is unopposed need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at end. The clerk, you must also notify opposing counsel 2006 - 2017 St. matthew 's Baptist Church - ALL Reserved. Next weeks rulings santa clara county superior court tentative rulings posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required St. 's! We load this page a ruling to arrange an appearance what specific issues... - ALL Rights Reserved ( b ) that the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary Approval of class action out... Before the Court unless contested while we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the website motion to by! 2017 St. matthew 's Baptist Church - ALL Rights Reserved posted envelopes ROE 1,.. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual hearing links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings the merits Victoria,!